← Portfolio
SpectrumIQIllustrative data

Market prioritization exercise

Compare metro areas using provider density, population growth, Medicare share, and income assumptions. The score does not measure existing EHR adoption or purchase intent.

●Synthetic provider counts + embedded metro reference values · 90 illustrative scores · 18 metros for Dermatology
Sort by:
#Metro AreaProvidersPer 100KScoreOpportunityTier
Methodology & Data Pipeline

This checked-in example combines generated provider counts with embedded demographic reference values. CMS NPPES and Census are source references, not verified live inputs to this displayed snapshot. Weights: provider density gap 35%, population growth 25%, Medicare population share 20%, income 20%. Medicare share is not measured utilization. Weights and tier cutoffs are analyst assumptions, not a fitted adoption model. The Python pipeline also accepts local source files; its checks validate output shape and ranges, not source accuracy or sales outcomes.